I"ve heard this term being thrown about for years. In boxing and now in MMA. What does it really mean though?The question has actually been thrown out... "Who is the ideal P4P fighter on the planet?" GSP? Fedor? Anderson?Well pound FOR POUND... Fedor would certainly be right? ns mean... He"s 230 pounds and can to win every and anybody. GSP is 170 lbs (weigh in weigh)... Anderson is 185... They would certainly get destroyed by Fedor. Every day, everyday.So why every the discussion. So someone tell me what the hell, pound FOR pound means.Thank you.-T
It method if you compare 2 battle aircraft from different weight classes, which one would certainly be the best if load wasn"t a aspect or if you were to magically "equalize them" to the exact same weight. In various other words, if you take it BJ Penn and "grew him" to Fedor"s weight, with the very same proportions and skills, then you would compare them to view who is better.

You are watching: What does pound for pound mean in boxing


It means if you compare 2 battle aircraft from various weight classes, i beg your pardon one would certainly be the finest if weight wasn"t a aspect or if you were to magically "equalize them" come the very same weight. In various other words, if you took BJ Penn and also "grew him" come Fedor"s weight, v the same proportions and also skills, climate you would certainly compare lock to watch who is better.
Ok so usually all the beat writers of the world that say the Anderson Silva is the ideal P4P fighter... They room saying the if he acquired 15 lbs (its been claimed that Silva walks roughly at 215) and also got to 230... That he would certainly defeat Fedor?No way.
Pound for pound is the only way to size up 2 fighters from various weight classes or also two differnet combat sports. It is no to say that need to #1PFP v. #2 PFP would certainly be a an excellent fight. You space taking into account the number of fights they have actually had. The variety of fights the they have lost. The top quality of foe they have beaten. The number of various methods that they can beat an opponent. Etc...... Girlfriend don"t look at even if it is Fedor might beat Faber. Of course he could but does the make that a much better all approximately fighter? No that does not. But just because that the record Fedor is a much better fighter 보다 Faber. Now if you have two battle aircraft in the exact same weight class then by all way they deserve to settle the PFP question in the ring.
Before street Ray, Benny Leonard was the first fighter that word used to and also he to be a lightweight the went 154 bouts without a loss end a 9 year stretch. So ns guess document does beat a role in the totality P4P title. For this reason Fedor can be considered the man. However him being a HEAVYWEIGHT has actually NOTHING to do with gift P4P.The P4P designation to be a means to evaluate a fighter based on his conference all the feasible challenges in ~ his size range.Good write-up dnfaught
*
just read your post. Were on the very same page.
I liken Pound-for-Pound to analysis science. (I"m involved to a research study chemist; your mileage with this analogy might vary.)The simple concept is to take a fighter"s skill set and capability and distill it down to a per-single-pound measurement. I liken it come chemistry: to to compare carbon and oxygen, you usage the unit that measurement called a "mole." (That"s the number 6.02x10^23 you were compelled to memorize.) Thus, you take it the Fedor skillset and divide it by 230, and also you have Fedor"s pound-for-pound value. Let"s describe this together variable F. =)So you"d take another fighter -- let"s speak Miguel Torres -- and also you"d use the same formula. You"d take it Torres"s skillset and capacity and divide it by 135. We"ll refer to this worth as T. (Digression: I chose Torres since he"s 5"9", has a 76" reach, and fights in ~ 135. The idea of him proportionally at heavyweight are very amusing come me. He"d look like the absent link.)Thus, is F > T? That"s your Pound-for-Pound question.
Everyone simply remember:The P4P designation to be a method to evaluate a fighter based upon his conference all the feasible challenges within his size range.
So both Fedor and also Anderson pertained to mind. Anderson has nearly CLEANED house with the MW division and the same deserve to be said around FEDOR!!
J
jt1163
hjdevnull said:
I liken Pound-for-Pound to analysis science. (I"m involved to a research chemist; her mileage through this analogy may vary.)The simple concept is to take a fighter"s skill set and ability and distill it under to a per-single-pound measurement. Ns liken it come chemistry: to compare carbon and also oxygen, you usage the unit of measurement called a "mole." (That"s the number 6.02x10^23 girlfriend were required to memorize.) Thus, you take the Fedor skillset and also divide the by 230, and also you have Fedor"s pound-for-pound value. Let"s describe this as variable F. =)So you"d take an additional fighter -- let"s to speak Miguel Torres -- and also you"d apply the same formula. You"d take it Torres"s skillset and capability and divide it through 135. We"ll describe this worth as T. (Digression: I determined Torres because he"s 5"9", has a 76" reach, and fights at 135. The idea of the proportionally in ~ heavyweight are very amusing to me. He"d look prefer the absent link.)Thus, is F > T? That"s your Pound-for-Pound question.
Dude, I never thought that I would certainly see words "mole" top top this site except referring come a remote furry little creature or something on a fighter"s face. Now, if someone starts talking around a triangle throttle looking choose an "f" orbital, I"m out of here.

See more: What Is The Difference Between A Relationship And An Exchange?


B
Big_Boy
jt1163 said:
. Now, if someone starts talking around a triangle choke looking like an "f" orbital, I"m the end of here.